Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Su Jeong Jang vs Anouk Koevermans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jang vs Koevermans analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Su Jeong Jang vs Anouk Koevermans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jang 0 - 0 Koevermans
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jang has won 45.27% of points on their second serve, while Koevermans has won 40.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jang, in recent form, has won 52.02% of their opponent's second serve points, while Koevermans has won 56.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.06% and 47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jang has saved 48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Koevermans has saved 53.74% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jang has won 58.49% of matches played (W/L 31/ 22), with Koevermans winning 66.67% (W/L 50/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 75/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14). Koevermans has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 34/ 20), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Jang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.14% of matches (W/L 25/ 18), where as Koevermans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.01% of matches (W/L 49/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jang has played against opponents with an average rank of 237 while Koevermans has played against players with an average rank of 267.59.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jang has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Koevermans has won 66% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jang has converted 47.97% of breakpoint opportunities, and Koevermans has converted 46.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
232
Rank
114
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
311
Rank
310
High
20
Age
Plays
Form
60% (424-284)
Career Total W/L
61% (114-74)
65% (20-11)
YTD W/L
64% (25-14)
$340,345
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Su Jeong Jang vs Anouk Koevermans For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Jang VS Koevermans
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Jang VS Koevermans H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Su Jeong Jang | Anouk Koevermans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (20/11) | 64% (25/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (45/26) | 58% (58/42) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (364/291) | 53% (507/450) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 67% (4/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | 67% (18/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (5/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 41 | 47 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.51 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 237 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:9 | 1:49:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 265.42 | 289.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1312/1904) | 62% (1691/2742) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (826/1312) | 59% (1005/1691) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (268/592) | 41% (426/1051) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (130/271) | 47% (195/416) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (954/2056) | 50% (1400/2780) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (3/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 62% (16/10) | 69% (24/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (20/31) | 64% (25/39) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 64% (7/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 64% (14/22) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 79% (24/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 21% (24/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 40% (15/6) |
Su Jeong Jang Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Tereza Valentova
Player
Su Jeong Jang
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
109)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
96
|
5-7 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Elena Pridankina
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Gabriela Lee
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Su Jeong Jang
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Julie Pastikova
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
60
|
4-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Panna Udvardy
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
46%
(
45 of
98)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
9
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Maja Chwalinska
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Gabriela Lee
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Su Jeong Jang
67%
(
80 of
119)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
55 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
103)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Anouk Koevermans Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Anouk Koevermans
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Kathinka Von Deichmann
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
81%
(
59 of
73)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Lola Radivojevic
66%
(
77 of
116)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
1
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
71%
(
10 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
47%
(
54 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
53 of
87)
115
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(4) 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Martina Okalova
67%
(
87 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
101 of
142)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
55%
(
48 of
87)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
52 of
101)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
48%
(
62 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
70 of
142)
138
Total Points Won
134
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Lucie Urbanova
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
42%
(
38 of
91)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Anouk Koevermans
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
75%
(
81 of
108)
1st Serve %
78%
(
89 of
114)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
50 of
89)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
49%
(
53 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
114)
108
Total Points Won
114
|
1-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Victoria Mboko
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
6
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Gina Feistel
69%
(
91 of
132)
1st Serve %
71%
(
69 of
97)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
51%
(
46 of
91)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
52%
(
68 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
51 of
97)
115
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 | 3-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Jang Vs Koevermans Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Jang are available here and Koevermans photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
